I see someone looking through my personal
information on my laptop and through some personal information I have left near
my computer but I do
not say anything.
In reality I would, probably slap that
person or want to kill them because they have no right to look through my
information.
BUT
Everyday we are being watched, everyday we
go on social networking sites and sites that we love purchasing clothes or
books from and give up our information freely without knowing the true harm
that is involved.
The question that is so hard to answer is
how important is surveillance and has it gone to far.
In a group we as a group made a Pecha Kucha
based on surveillance that takes place on social networking as well as looking
at mass surveillance in general. Firstly, focusing on social networking sites ,
being a person that uses Twitter and occasionally Facebook the information I
found out as a fellow user made me feel very uneasy. Because, I am aware that the
information that I display about myself can be viewed by the general public; however
knowing that my information could be sold to corporate leaders through the
owners of social networking sites should be classified as a invasion of
privacy.
Is this age that we live in today the
selling of information is not classified
as stealing?
Conversely some companies and social
networking sites could argue that the reason they take our information is
because of collective intelligence.
Which is quite helpful for us as consumers who for example want to buy
products on Amazon or eBay the information collected by these companies help
our search, But that the only good that can come from it.
When companies collect our information on
social networks not recognizing or should I say not caring that Online social
networking sites are meant to be out of individual desire or pleasure
additionally allowing the users new ways of constructing identity, meeting
friends and colleagues. Not only is this disrupting our privacy but moral right
to have freedom that is being taken away from users everyday.
Correspondingly surveillance may have to
bypass our moral rights to provide safety for us. For example, when we are at the
airport there are numerous amounts of checks just for the safety of the country
and general public. So without these checks and the enhanced technology used to
provide security and safety to people, security risks such as, the 9/11 and
other terrorist attacks may put us in danger.
It could be said that we as users of the
Internet spy on each other day (users of what). We are virtual peeping Toms who
love to see what is happening in other people’s lives. Michel Foucault discusses the idea of the
panopticon in the context of the surveillance in prisons, in the case of the 21st
century that we live today. It could be construed that we live in a digital
panopticon. The ideas of David Lyons and Zygmunt Bauman stated that we live in
“liquid society”. Both these theorists convey that the panopticon is no longer just
a CCTV camera or doisers files but the modern society of surveillance is
consumed in gathering information through social networking and loyalty cards
etc. Nonetheless, we are dissolved into different forms of surveillance with
RFIDS, mobile phones, biometric scanners and fingerprint and face recognitions
to access of phones.
Some people do not notice the CCTV cameras
or what they do or present on the Internet about themselves. Others do and are
offended but in my opinion surveillance is a required technology in the country
but has outstretched its boundaries in many different circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment